Home

Salt vs ansible

Saltstack vs Ansible Top 12 Differences You Should Kno

Ansible vs Salt What are the differences

This Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack comparison video will compare the DevOps configuration management tools Chef, Puppet, Ansible and Saltstack in. Although SaltStack is again a configuration management tool it has a more declarative style, like Terraform. Like Ansible, Chef and Puppet it is a mutable infrastructure paradigm. It requires the installation of agent software and to run a master server. Lately, SaltStack has been gaining an increase in developers' interest This talk will cover the pros and cons of four different OpenStack deployment mechanisms. Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt for OpenStack all claim to make it. Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine. Chef - Build, destroy and rebuild servers on any public or private cloud. Salt - Fast, scalable and flexible software for data center automatio

CAPS: What's best for deploying and managing OpenStack

Ansible does have its advantages as it is directed more towards a SysOps oriented role in regard to its structure and paradigm. Salt is similar in this aspect, but it is unlike Puppet and Chef as they are more Developer oriented. Additionally, Ansible is one of the easier options in this list to set up, configure and begin using right away As a latest entrant in the market compared with Puppet, Chef and Salt, Ansible was developed to simplify complex orchestration and configuration management tasks. The platform is written in Python and allows users to script commands in YAML as an imperative programming paradigm Ansible's free training and tutorials do no provide as much depth and ease for first time users trying it out for the first time. From the limited experience we have had with Ansible Tower, the UI is not very user friendly. There's a lot of bells and whistles that can prove o be overwhelming at times. Read full review . Verified User. Engineer in Information Technology. Hospital & Health Care. Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt The leading configuration management and orchestration tools take different paths to server automatio

When comparing SaltStack vs Ansible, the Slant community recommends Ansible for most people. Salt can run agentless just like ansible, allowing it to manage devices that you can't run an agent on (routers/switches, etc). Pro. Communicates through SSH or agents. Salt can communicate with clients through agents called minions, or through SSH. Pro. Scalable. With Salt you can have multiple. Ansible vs SaltStack 谁才是自动化运维好帮手? 1.概述. 互联网技术的发展,机房里面机器的数量随之增加,运维的难度和复杂度也在增加,需要投入的运维人员和成本也在增加,从而催生了一系列的自动化运维工具(Ansible、SaltStack、Puppet)的产生来减少运维的成本 Side-by-side comparison of Salt and Ansible. See how many websites are using Salt vs Ansible and view adoption trends over time

Difference Between Saltstack vs Ansible The following article sets out the description of Saltstack vs Ansible. The open-source software for information technology automation that is driven by events is called Saltstack. The software is Python-based. I SaltStack vs Ansible 对比SaltStack篇部署SaltStack配置SaltStack测试命令证书grants文件Pillar组件Module组件State配置语言YAML 语言编译安装NginxnginxSaltStack 安装httpd 服务SaltStack 文件管理SaltStack 修改cronsaltstack 编译nginxsa . SaltStack 和 Ansible 的简单比较. neoq 2017-07-26 17:33:18 9367 收藏 3 分类专栏: linux devops 文章标签. Ansible vs Chef vs other configuration management tools. Ansible and Chef vie for leadership with other notable configuration management tools like SaltStack, Terraform and Puppet among the most notable. These tools serve the purpose of provisioning and maintaining server farms in a predictable, time-saving fashion whether hosted on-premise or on cloud platforms like Azure and AWS. Large scale. Ansible vs SaltStack: Which is better? We compared these products and thousands more to help professionals like you find the perfect solution for your business. Let IT Central Station and our comparison database help you with your research Salt, like Ansible, has a small learning curve and is a good choice for companies with limited programming resources. It's open source. This means it is easily extended and customizable. Salt can accommodate any language to render configurations, providing sufficient control over files. SaltStack is CLI-based and can be configured as a master-client or non-centralized model. Based in Python.

Salt vs. Ansible - GitHub Page

  1. ions which run as agents in the client machine. Apart from this Chef vs puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack blog, if you want to get trained from professionals on these technologies, you can opt for a structured training from edureka! Click below to know more
  2. Ansible vs. Puppet: Support. As Puppet has been around several years longer than Ansible, you can probably already guess that there would be more support for it and a bigger developer community—and you'd be right. There's a dedicated support portal with a knowledge base, and two levels of professional support are offered: Standard (included) and Premium. You can also access a technical.
  3. Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. SaltStack By Anuket Jain On 4 July 2017 In Automation Tool Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt were all built to make it much easier to configure and maintain more than hundred of servers
  4. Review: Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt The leading configuration management and orchestration tools take different paths to server automatio
  5. Ansible is rated 8.6, while SaltStack is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Ansible writes Check mode enables us to verify that the config we have pushed is what we intended. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SaltStack writes Easily identify and manage compliance and vulnerability issues in a single, centralized view. Ansible is most compared with SCCM, BigFix, Red Hat Satellite.
  6. imal intelligence required. Puppet is very intriguing simply because it requires a higher level of intelligence. Salt offered a tutorial but Puppet offers a direct line of.
  7. Smoke Signals vs Smart Phones. Configuration management (CM) tools like Puppet, Chef, SaltStack, and Ansible are so powerful that it's like moving from using smoke signals to communicate to having a smart phone. That's one of the reasons you will pretty much never hear the companies behind these tools ever bash each other. More than competing.

I also prefer the 2 built in python (Ansible, Salt) because I prefer python over ruby. I use Ansible the most, but that's because frequently use it to run Jenkins jobs or provision machine images. Puppet. Puppet was the first configuration management system I used and I spent a good few years using it. I like that Puppet maintains state and will pull from the master in set intervals. I think. Ansible vs Salt. Hello, Salt was installed before I was hired. Currently, we don't seem to use it for much, except as a central server to communicate to other servers (aka minions). I don't believe it has been used to provision new machines. I've played around with Ansible and am having a better time learning it than Salt. I want to leverage Ansible for provisioning on other projects. SUSE Manager vs Ansible. The Ansible management tool puts the emphasis on simplicity, and Ansible is best suited for small and relatively simple infrastructures. Part of the simplicity of Ansible is that, unlike other similar products, it has no notion of state and does not track dependencies. The tool simply executes a series of tasks and. Ansible vs. Nornir: Speed Challenge. by Patrick Ogenstad; November 05, 2019; When talking about Nornir and Ansible, speed is one of the topics that come up from time to time. A common argument for Nornir is that it performs better when working with either many hosts or lots of data. For some who hear this, it isn't entirely clear what we mean. This article will look at some numbers. Recently. Posts of this series: Part 1: Ansible Hello World (this post) with a comparison of Ansible vs. Salt vs. Chef vs. Puppet and a hello world example with focus on Playbooks (i.e. tasks), Inventories (i.e. groups of targets) and remote shell script execution. Part 2: Ansible Templating Hello World focuses on templating; we will create and upload template files based on jinja2

Review: Puppet vs

Puppet vs Salt vs Chef vs Ansible, which to choose? Diskussion auf reddit.com; DevOps Tools - Chef, Puppet, Saltstack and Ansible Comparison; Mit Puppet, Chef und andere Rechenzentrumswerkzeugen - Datacenter-Automatisierung mit Open-Source-Tools; Infrastructure as Code: Chef, Ansible, Puppet, or Terraform? Architektur + HowTo . Puppet Enterprise Reference Architectures; What is Ansible? Quick. A Biased Critique of Ansible vs. Salt Search Results. By Nicholas M. Hughes. May 31, 2019. So here I am, gearing up to write a blog post comparing the features of Ansible and Salt for probably the one-hundredth time while somehow finding something new to say. My business partner and resident Network Guru, Jon Gordon, has been getting hit with a lot of questions surrounding this topic in the. Ansible vs. Salt - Detailed Comparison. Close. 27. Posted by 6 years ago. Archived. Ansible vs. Salt - Detailed Comparison. missingm.co/catego... 4 comments. share. save hide report. 92% Upvoted. This thread is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Sort by. best. Review: Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt The leading configuration management and orchestration tools take different paths to server automation The proliferation of virtualization coupled with the increasing power of industry-standard servers and the availability of cloud computing has led to a significant uptick in the number of servers that need to be managed within and without an. @stacksofplates said in Opinions: Ansible vs. Salt: I don't think it's slow at all. I've run both Puppet and Ansible and they seem pretty comparable. Not necessarily a good comparison, Puppet is one of the slow ones that Salt specifically was designed to address. Not saying Ansible is slow, I don't know. I just know that Salt was specifically designed to be fast because Puppet was so slow. I.

Salt and Ansible are both pretty great and it amounts to an embarrassment of riches that I was even able to do a writeup like this. We are fortunate to live in a world where they both exist. Aside from Ansible, I would still rather use Salt than anything else. I plan on trying to stay current with both of them. Things are moving fast and I am excited to see where both projects are in a year. Last month Infoworld published an article titled Review: Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt written by Paul Venezia, that prompted many people in the configuration management community to get in touch with us to ask why CFEngine was not included. Our answer was simple: No, we have no clear reason as to why this has occurred and it is bizarre not to have included CFEngine in the. SaltStack vs. Ansible One of the things that we've called out very specifically around Ansible was that it was slow. On speed and efficiency Ansible was neutral to low, where SaltStack was a thumbs up So now, Salt has cloud provisioning, and Chef and Puppet are starting too as well. I'll share with you my reasons for creating Terraform vs. augmenting those tools or working with those tools to make them good cloud provisioning tools. Given my disclaimer above, I don't know if Ansible does any of these things. Here we go. 1.) For Puppet and Chef, I felt their agent-based model was just wrong. Compare Vagrant and Ansible's popularity and activity. Categories: Development Environment. Vagrant is less popular than Ansible

Compare Ansible and Salt's popularity and activity. Categories: Development Environment. Ansible is more popular than Salt Start your review of Taste Test: Puppet vs Chef vs Salt vs Ansible. Write a review. Nov 07, 2013 David rated it it was amazing. Great read if you are looking into how to configure machines in a repeatable way. flag 1 like · Like · see review. Manjunath. Ansible is powerful automation that you can learn quickly. Chef: With Chef you can manage servers - 5 or 5,000 of them - by turning your infrastructure into code. Time-consuming activities like manual patching, configuration updates, and service installations for every server will no longer exist. Puppet: Learn more about the Puppet open source projects that are used by more than.

Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack: Which One to

SUSE Manager vs. Ansible Automation. The Ansible management tool puts the emphasis on simplicity. Ansible is best suited for small and relatively simple infrastructures. Part of Ansible's simplicity is that, unlike other similar products, it has no notion of state and does not track dependencies. The tool simply executes a series of tasks and. Salt vs Ansible - Tapez 2 mots clés et cliquez sur le bouton 'Fight !'. Le gagnant est celui qui a la meilleure visibilité sur Google Puppet Bolt and RedHat Ansible both try to solve the same problems of agentless, push-based orchestration and configuration management. Naturally, though, they don't have exactly the same features. I would keep the following in mind: Ansible is a mature product in this space (at the time of writing), and Bolt is a new product. A consequence of this is you'll find Ansible roles already written. Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs SaltStack | Configuration Management Tools Comparison | Edureka be in Linux/Unix machine Chef Server works only in Linux/Unix but Chef Client and Workstation can be on windows as well Salt Master works only on Linux/Unix but Salt minions can work on windows as well Puppet Master works only on Linux/Unix but Puppet Agent also works on windows 21. www.edureka.co.

Ansible is easy to get started with, whilst it is written in Python you don't need to know any Python to use it. Ansible is agentless - unlike Puppet or Chef or Salt you do not need to install an agent. It only require SSH access to your network devices. There is a great community and plenty of support for Ansible. Very low barrier of entr We know that Salt and Ansible are more designed for SysAdmins (which we are). Puppet is the most widely adopted of the platforms, and Chef is the cheapest. The major problem with all of these solutions is that they are dramatically more expensive than our existing management solution. Chef does come close to our current prices, but I'm the only sysadmin in my organization with any experience. Salt (sometimes referred to as SaltStack) is Python-based, open-source software for event-driven IT automation, remote task execution, and configuration management. Supporting the infrastructure as code approach to data center system and network deployment and management, configuration automation, SecOps orchestration, vulnerability remediation, and hybrid cloud control. History. Salt.

Ansible v.s. Salt (SaltStack) v.s. StackStorm by Anthony ..

Chef, Puppet, Ansible, and SaltStack are all configuration management tools, which means they are designed to deploy, configure and manage servers. But do you know which among Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack is the best tool for IT automation? I have written this blog to let you know the pros and cons o Puppet, Chef, Ansible and SaltStack present different paths to achieve a common goal of managing large-scale server infrastructure efficiently, with minimal input from developers and sysadmins. All four configuration management tools are designed to reduce the complexity of configuring distributed infrastructure resources, enabling speed, and ensuring reliability and compliance. This article. 25 Salt - Free vs $$ SaltStack does have an Enterprise version that adds a number of extra features, but the OSS release allows a more sophisticated Automation and Orchestration setup than Ansible. However, this comes at the cost of the extra effort for setup How Ansible Works. When it comes to Ansible, you have two computer categories - managed nodes and control nodes. Managed nodes refer to the devices that are managed by the control node. On the other hand, control nodes refer to the computers that run Ansible. This IT automation tool connects nodes, which includes all entities in your configuration on a network. Then, it sends a small program.

Ansible vs Salt Offlinewallet

Compare SaltStack and Ansible's popularity and activity. Categories: DevOps Tools. SaltStack is less popular than Ansible Review: Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt (InfoWorld Daily Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) Credit: Teerawut Punsorn The proliferation of virtualization coupled with the increasing power of industry-standard servers and the availability of cloud computing has led to a significant uptick in the number of servers that need to be managed within and without an organization Hi, I'm the original author of Ansible and run engineering for AnsibleWorks. I'd definitely recommend to everyone to find some time to find the language that works the best for you. You are going to be spending a lot of time at least initially. Part I: Ansible Hello World with a comparison of Ansible vs. Salt vs. Chef vs. Puppet and a hello world example with focus on Playbooks (i.e. tasks), Inventories (i.e. groups of targets) and remote shell script execution. Part II: Ansible Hello World reloaded with focus on templating: create and upload files based on jinja2 templates How to Manage LEBs (128MB): Puppet vs Chef vs Ansible vs Salt vs cfengine. raindog308 Moderator. January 2016 in Help. Looking for something like one of these, with these requirements: the master I can run on something big (4GB VPS with SSD CentOS 7, though it's also doing other things) the client or whatever is OK running on a 128MB VPS. I don't control the initial templates. encrypted.

Video: Deployment Management Tools: Chef vs

Ansible vs Saltstack +5 votes. I'm very confused whether to use Ansible or Saltstack as my Configuration management tool. Can you please suggest me which would be easier to use as i'm a beginner. devops; saltstack; ansible; devops-tools; ansible-playbook; Sep 25, 2018 in DevOps & Agile by Hannah • 18,410 points • 215 views. answer comment. flag; 2 answers to this question. +1 vote. Best. Puppet vs Ansible. Free / paid. 15 6 . Get it here. 39 11 . When comparing Puppet vs Ansible, the Slant community recommends Ansible for most people. In the questionWhat are the best configuration management tools? Ansible is ranked 1st while Puppet is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose Ansible is: Ansible does not use agents. Instead, all master-agent communications are. Menu Yet Another Puppet vs Chef vs Ansible vs Salt Topic 01 July 2015. Whenever there is a configuration management discussion, there is always a debate that spins around Puppet vs Chef vs Ansible vs SaltStack topic (ok CFEngine people, don't be pissed, i will talk about it too).. In general these discussions are generally bias fueled and leads to nothing but a dead end

Opinions: Ansible vs. SaltStack. This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it. D. David_CSG last edited by David_CSG . I do realize this is an OLD post (relatively speaking) but I appreciate(d) finding it, as I'm currently revisiting Salt vs. Ansible, and while I thought I was leaning towards Salt, perhaps it might be Ansible instead at this point. Not. Pulumi vs. Other; Chef, Puppet, etc. Pulumi vs. Chef, Puppet, etc. Chef, Puppet, Ansible, and Salt are all popular configuration management tools. These tools help you install and manage software on existing cloud infrastructure, either for bootstrapping a virtual machine, or patching one. They do not attempt to solve the problem of. DSC and Ansible modules have a common goal which is to define and ensure the state of a resource. Because of this, resources like the DSC File resource and Ansible win_file can be used to achieve the same result. Deciding which to use depends on the scenario. Reasons for using an Ansible module over a DSC resource: The host does not support PowerShell v5.0, or it cannot easily be upgraded. The. Ansible vs Chef. I wrote an earlier post about evaluating Ansible as an alternative to Chef. So after spending many years with Chef, I've found that Ansible is a lot easier to manage with startups. It's easier to train developers, it's easier to manage inventory and orchestration, and it works reasonably well on the scale of thousands of hosts

Chef vs. Puppet vs. Ansible vs. Salt - 哪种工具是最好的 OpenStack 部署管理工具 . 2015年10月28日发布. This talk will cover the pros and cons of four different OpenStack deployment mechanisms. Puppet, Chef, Ansible, and Salt for OpenStack all claim to make it much easier to configure and maintain hundreds of OpenStack deployment resources. With the advent of large-scale. Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt 9:25 AM No comments Infoworld - The proliferation of virtualization coupled with the increasing power of industry-standard servers and the availability of cloud computing has led to a significant uptick in the number of servers that need to be managed within and without an organization If you found this blog on Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack relevant, check out the DevOps training by Edureka, a trusted online learning company with a network of more than 250,000 satisfied learners spread across the globe. The Edureka DevOps Certification Training course helps learners gain expertise in various DevOps processes and tools such as Puppet, Jenkins, Nagios and GIT. Compare Ansible and SaltStack's popularity and activity. Categories: DevOps Tools. Ansible is more popular than SaltStack [Ansible is a very powerful and simple automation tool that can be used to manage and configure a fleet of servers, using Ansible with Rancher can be a very efficient method to start your environment and manage your Docker containers. This month we are hosting an online meetup in which we'll be demonstrating how to run microservices in Docker containers and orchestration application upgrades.

This article tries to provide one possible way to set up the Continuous Integration, Delivery or Deployment pipeline. We'll use Jenkins, Docker, Ansible and Vagrant to set up two servers. One will be used as a Jenkins server and the other one as an imitation of production servers. First one will checkout, test and buil Cesta ze SaltStacku do Ansible v Bigdata prost red Petr Krch @v1dlak, Radim Lipov can @radimlipovcan 5. r jna 2019 Bigdata system engineer

Review: Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt. SPONSORED BY Advertiser Name Here Sponsored item title goes here as designed. Review: Ansible shows the beef . Must-have devops tools for Windows. »Salt Provisioner. Provisioner name: salt The Vagrant Salt provisioner allows you to provision the guest using Salt states. Salt states are YAML documents that describes the current state a machine should be in, e.g. what packages should be installed, which services are running, and the contents of arbitrary files.. NOTE: The Salt provisioner is builtin to Vagrant

Choosing a deployment tool - ansible vs puppet vs chef vs salt

Salt websites CFEngine websites; Datanyze Universe: 881: 604: Alexa top 1M: 817: 575: Alexa top 100K: 430: 359: Alexa top 10K: 191: 167: Alexa top 1K: 58: 52: Alexa. Salt Open Community The Salt open source software community is huge and vibrant. Get Salted with us. Salt Innovation Projects Innovative, next-gen open source projects maintained by SaltStack. Get Access; VMware announces intent to acquire SaltStack. Learn more. SaltConf is back! This year SaltStack is Virtually Everywhere on Oct 29. Register now! Control and secure your digital infrastructure. Compare SaltStack vs Terraform. 71 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more Ansible is more popular than Puppet Last month Infoworld published an article titled Review: Puppet vs. Chef vs. Ansible vs. Salt written by Paul Venezia, that prompted many people in the configuration management community to get in.. Ansible, Puppet, Chef, all are open source deployment management tools, used to manage competently large-scale server infrastructure, by enabling speed and. Ansible Vs Puppet Vs Chef Differences of Ansible Vs . To understand Puppet vs Chef vs Docker vs Ansible better, let's take an example. (Note: We can do this in many ways, it's just an example.) Acronis is directly responsible for saving our company 1200 hours per year for IT operations staff in backup and recovery workflows. CIO, high performance IT company. Read details in a report by.

Why we use Terraform and not Chef, Puppet, Ansible

  • Roku codes for french channels.
  • برج الميزان اليوم منيب الشيخ.
  • Montagne oslo.
  • Balla keita.
  • Astral sousse contact.
  • Tunisie vs libye.
  • Restauration motobecane.
  • Velo elliptique resultat combien temps.
  • Chat errant affamé.
  • Frange rideau avec lunettes.
  • Crumble courgettes saumon.
  • Vêtements bon marché en ligne.
  • Griffe de jardin.
  • Renforcement musculaire exercice.
  • Projet de loi interculturalisme.
  • Tolkien pdf.
  • Carte d affiliation sécurité sociale.
  • Immigration francaise etats unis.
  • Univers infini amour.
  • Tf2 spy backstory.
  • Network utility windows.
  • Formation investissement immobilier gratuite.
  • Pourquoi voyager en autocar.
  • Carafe verre vintage.
  • Brocanteur cugnaux.
  • Manoeuvre frauduleuse pour tromper quelqu'un afin d'obtenir son consentement.
  • Novotel montreal centre.
  • Smartphone samsung galaxy a3.
  • Taxus if.
  • Magnetic resonance in medicine.
  • Version power bi.
  • Twilly d'hermès eau poivrée.
  • Rousseau contrat social citation.
  • Dresseur de hyene.
  • The game 1997 1080p.
  • Combien gagne le groupe bts.
  • Probleme connexion ecran tour.
  • Jorvik tricycle.
  • Hache charpentier gransfors.
  • Wild thyme london.
  • Poloma battlerite.